Archive for the ‘spirituality’ Category

OH… MY… GOODNESS

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

I was listening to Michael Youssef today and he started talking about this conspiracy theory of his… it surrounds the Earth Charter. Ever heard of it?

Well… it’s not a theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Charter

Check the History section. Mikhail Gorbachev? Plus it’s been endorsed by over 250 universities around the world. And by the US Conference of mayors which consists of… all the mayors of US cities with populations of 30,000 or more.

“The Charter has received opposition from several groups. For example, in the United States, members of religious groups, such as the Religious Right have objected to the document on the grounds that it is secular, and espouses socialism. In addition, some conservatives cite an informal comment by Mikhail Gorbachev that the document is “a kind of Ten Commandments” and point to the fact that at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, a copy of the document was placed symbolically in an “Ark of Hope” — an independent project by the American artist Sally Linder. A number of conspiracy theorists claim that the founders of the Earth Charter are attempting to establish a global super-state to enforce the Charter.”

Conspiracy theorists, my FOOT! Go and read the bloody thing, it’s written right in there! “In order to build a sustainable global community, the nations of the world must renew their commitment to the United Nations, fulfill their obligations under existing international agreements, and support the implementation of Earth Charter principles with an international legally binding instrument on environment and development. ” (emphasis mine) Also see this page: http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/articles/268/1/A-new-Guide-for-Using-the-Earth-Charter-in-Education-/Page1.html

In addition to educators, the charter openly states that it intends to involve governments and the media in it’s mission. It calls for tolerance of all religions, people of any sexual orientation, worship of nature, a “global civil community”, universal healthcare (including free access to birth control) and education, and special attention to the rights of minorities and indigenous peoples. (Someone told me in an email they weren’t sure where the destabilizing influences in the US were coming from… now we know.)

And if you don’t believe this seemingly far-fetched article, then go to the homepage of the Ark of Hope, where they readily admit that the claims about this beastly, blasphemous box of balogna are true – and to samvandina.com (see the section appropriately titled “a third pillar” and the section that describes the “drafting process”.)

I’ve said this before but now I’m REALLY saying it… The End is Near. lol

I gave up…

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

… on waiting until I had an extremely thought-provoking response to the heresy that all non-Jewish governments are also bound by the laws that were handed down to Israel by Moses in the dessert. And if there weren’t enough prepositions in there for ya’, I don’t know what to tell ya’…

Anyways, the contents of my file:

Deut. 12:32 – “What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.” is often quoted as an argument that we don’t have to follow any of the laws the government makes, as long as they don’t appear in the Bible. I have to say, this is a damnable perversion of scripture. It is, I suspect, intentionally taken out of context. A quick glance through Deut. 12 will reveal that these are laws that were specifically intended ONLY for the children of Israel while they were living in the promised land. The laws didn’t even go into effect for them, until AFTER they possessed their inheritance. (See v. 1, “which ye shall observe to do IN THE LAND…”, v. 10, v. 29. )

Also go back and read the whole of chapter 11, especially v. 8 and vs. 31-32. See also chapter 8, v. 1 and v. 11 – read the whole chapter and then answer this question: to whom did Moses give the commandments. And on what day? (Hint, part of the answer is in chapter 1:1). Also look at chapter 5:1.

Note that this is a continuous dialog. Moses starts his address to the children of Israel in Deut. 1:1 and ends it in Deut. 34:12. You can’t just pull 12:32 right out of the Bible and try to hit us over the head with it.  You can’t separate that verse from all the verses that come before it, about how this was a legal code handed down specifically to the nation of Israel, one they were expected to follow once they entered the promised land.

Then there’s Deut. 4:2… which comes right after verse 1. Forget about verse 1. Don’t look at it, don’t think about it. Verse 2 isn’t for the children of Israel, it isn’t a laying down of the law for that particular nation at that particular time. No, that isn’t stated specifically in verse 1 or anything, really. But don’t look at verse 1 to find out whether I’m lying.

Also, the context isn’t further clarified in verse 5; verse 6 doesn’t make any distinction between the way the Israelites live and the way other nations live; and verses 7-8 don’t a rhetorical question which points out that NO OTHER NATION HAS STATUES AND JUDGMENTS LIKE THESE. No, the covenant that the Lord made with the children of Israel on that day (verse 13) was binding on all governments of all nations until the end of time.  Also don’t bother to check verse 14 and find out, once again, why I can’t believe the covenant doctrine, or whatever it’s called,  is anything but intentional deception.

Even those famous 10 commandments are for the children of Israel. Look at Deut. 6:1-3. I guess those who tell us we are expected to live and die by these 10 commandments, and that we are free to break the law with impunity if it doesn’t limit itself to them, are counting on the fact that most people just look at the commandments all by themselves, and don’t view them as a part of the whole chapter or the whole book, or the whole Bible.

So which parts do apply to me? Well, for starters, probably not the verses that come with an explicit explanation of exactly how and why they don’t apply to me. And for seconds, probably not the infamous verse about how Abraham took up the knife to slay Isaac his son. Boy wouldn’t I be confused, if I had to choose to believe that Isaac was my son, and that I was supposed to take up a knife and slay him? Or that I had already done so? I can’t even begin to fathom what sorts of things would follow from that; In fact, my perception of reality would end up so skewed that it would prevent me from functioning in society. I might even be called insane, because I chose to believe something the Bible clearly was not trying to teach.

This is where that saying, God gave you a brain, use it, comes into play. God doesn’t want us ripping random verses out of the scripture and perverting them to support our anti-social lifestyles. He wants us to compare the way we live to what we find in scripture, honestly. If it doesn’t mesh, then we ourselves, and not our subjective interpretations of scripture, should be adjustmented.

The reason we don’t do this is that we want to give up too early, blaming a faulty understanding of scripture for our own shortcomings, rather than going through the fire and allowing patience to have its perfect work.

But back to the question, which parts of scripture apply to me? Quick answer, Acts 15:1-29. Here the Holy Spirit explicitly states that non-Jews are not to be burdened with Levitican law.

“What then, shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid! How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” – Rom 6:1&2 I mean, I can hear you saying, “Abraham, all those laws have to be there for a reason. Surely you don’t mean to tell me there are huge sections of the Bible that aren’t applicable to modern-day Christians!?”

Of course not. The Bible is there, as it always has been, to convict us of sin. To reveal the nature of God in contrast with our own sinfulness. To help us grow in faith. I’ll direct you to I Pet. 2:1-3 and Galatians 5-6:1. Also to John 16:7-8.  And Romans 7, particularly verse 7.

And finally, to Hebrews 8:10-13. If you need to be taught laws and codes of conduct in order to live right; if your conscience doesn’t tell you what is right and wrong; if it isn’t pricked when you are tempted to live in violation of the teachings of I Peter 2:12-20, (but esp. v. 16),  and by the example of the Lord Himself in Matt. 17:24-27; if you can’t hear the voice of the Holy Spirit leading you in the right way and convicting you of sin; if the law of love isn’t already written on your heart, then maybe it’s time to find out where you are before the Lord, and whether or not you may be in need of salvation from the death sentence that is found in the law.

Raymond on Mysticism and Faith

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

“The mode of the religious is faith. The mode of the mystic is experience. We do not enact rituals and promulgate dogmas to express our `faith’ that the sun rises in the east, because it is a fact of experience. No more does a true shaman or mystic invest faith in the god(s) he or she invokes; they too are facts of experience. The elevation of `faith’ is, in fact, a sign that a religious tradition is losing its ability to induce theophany, or has already lost it.” – Eric Raymond, 3rd Degree Wiccan

I guess I always knew I was a Christian mystic, and not a member of some dead religion. Funny though… his description of “faith” and “dogma” applies to atheism, just as much as it applies to any other religion.

Oh, great… thanks, Prejean

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

heh, parental warning.

Donald Trump is a spineless pervert. I just wanted to say that.

Okay… I’m glad Prejean isn’t going to get kicked out of the Miss California contest for decrying homosexuality. She has a right to her opinion and frankly, she deserves a shot at miss America. Punishing someone for being honest about their beliefs is a criminal act.

However… she should have stopped there, because frankly, I don’t get it. “I don’t believe in homosexuality because I’m a Christian.” Really? Is that also why you pose for inappropriate photos?? So, would that be, um, the other part of your Christian testimony? I mean, if I’m mistaken here, would someone be kind enough to correct me?

This is not the kind of witness we need right now. “Yeah, we Christians are just as perverted as the rest of you… but at least we also know how to discriminate.” I know you Christians are thinking, “wait, no, that’s not it… um, you see…”

So for anyone who doesn’t already see through the double standard, okay? The Bible teaches 1) homosexuality is a sin, 2) so is posing for nude photos. There is no double standard in the Bible, just misguided Christians who find it easier and easier to see what’s wrong with everyone else, while they totally miss their own, um, faults… er…

I mean, uh…

Anyway, this whole thing is probably retaliatory libel, and I’d seriously like to hear from anyone who has more info in said vein.

Who is right?

Saturday, February 21st, 2009

I’m just a loc’d out brother
Com’n straight from S.D.
Just another islander, beaner, wop, minority
Taught to love one antother, all races
All types of colors, different skin, different faces
Can you answer my question, when I ask you who is right?
Racists come in all forms of colors black of white
So take that when I say your hatred s…!
Coming from the H-I-T man, so what’s up?
If you ain’t down with my white brother we ain’t down with you
And if you ain’t down with my clack brother then we ain’t down with
YOU, PUNK, TALKIN’ THAT TRASH,
WHITE TRASH, BLACK TRASH, YOU GET A BACK TO BACK SLAP
You think I’m soft, then you don’t know me
Cause no I don’t play that and I’m definitely not your homie
He’ll take your pride for a long ride, try and hide
You hate my outside, how bout my inside
It’s just me and my boys and we’ll hit ‘em up
Yeah, come on ya’ll, get ‘em up
One for peace, two for love and three for my G-O-D
Yeah, come on ya’ll, get ‘em up
Get your hands up
One for peace, two for love and three for my G-O-D
Now that’s dread to you head for my final conclusion
Straight up acts 10 homes it’s Peter’s vision
So get up Peter, kill and eat
Surely not Lord, this meat is unclean
For my Lord makes nothin’ unclean
Creatures of the world, all beasts and human bein’s
Black or white, who is right?
BLACK OR WHITE
WHO IS RIGHT
Peace and love through my Lord Jesus Christ!
Then Peter began to speak, I now realize how God does not show
Favoritism but accepts man from every nation
Who fear Him and do what is right
Black or white, who is right?

- POD (an oldie but a goodie ;)

Prayer and Sin

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

In my study of world religions I came across two serious objections to the teachings of Christianity. Most of the objections I come across are stupid and poorly-thought-out, but these two have cropped up in my thinking again and again, because they seem to make a certain amount of sense.

The first is about prayer, and I believe I finally have an answer. It ocurred to me while I was reading Murray’s book, “With Christ in the School of Prayer.” But the explanation requires a little excursion into my train of thought.

Prayer, from the perspective of a thinking outside observer, appears to be little more than ineffectual hoping. You might balk at the idea, but think about it for a minute. How do you explain all of those ‘no’ answers? “It wasn’t God’s will.” And in response to, “Why pray then?”, we usually say something that can be reduced to, “God just likes to hear what we’re thinking once in awhile, so He won’t get lonely.” Or worse, “Well, if you don’t pray, then you’re sure not to get it, because God often waits to carry out His will until someone prays for it.”

Then you have to go on to argue, “Then is God’s hand shortened, that it cannot save?” Of course not… and a 5-pointed Calvinist (this term is used derisively on purpose, and therefore doesn’t apply to you Calvinists of a sharper disposition) says, “well, God always ordains someone to ask Him to do what He wants to do.” That sounds to me like a bit of stretch–

But it gets even worse when the rubber meets the road, and we come right down to my personal prayer life. Because when I pray, how am I, as an individual, supposed to know whether what I am praying for is God’s will, and; therefore, whether or not I will get an answer? In effect, the neigh-sayers are right. I’m only expressing my desires to God, with the vague hope that what I ask for will coincide with His will. And if this is true, then what is prayer if not a useless, misplaced desire– a lazy replacement for taking action?

Indeed, certain religions take this “prayer,” which I have just described, and which ocurrs primarily in a self-subjugated position called “kneeling;” and, they replace it with a little thing called “Will,” which is capitalised in those belief systems just as it is here. The idea is, the stronger your will is, the more likely you are to get what you ask for, because instead of asking for what you want, and asking, and asking and asking, and doing nothing at all, you say, “Hallowed be MY name! MY kingdom come… MY will be done on earth, for there IS no heaven!!” And that is supposed to increase the likelihood that you will get up, go outside, and accomplish more of what you want by the time you expire than the ineffectual, unfaithful prayer of an unrighteous man could avail in ten thousand years.

Well, first of all, these religions also have loopholes. If you don’t get what you want, then either you didn’t want it badly enough (your will was either weak or divided), or you wanted something that just wasn’t possible. After all, there are still the laws of nature to consider– but since we’re trying to get what we want, why not do as much as possible to stack things in our favor? Here is where Christianity actually trumps, because our God is not confined by our thinking, and He can do things that don’t fit our superimposed models of observation, these so-called “natural laws”. The difference here isn’t that those with the Will to Power [Nietsche, Beyond Good and Evil; and Freud, On the Interperetation of Dreams] somehow vouchsafe to themselves the impossible; the difference is supposed to be that the Freudians and Nietsche-ans go out and take, while many (and I dare say, most!) Christians sit around and hope that things will start going their way.

Second of all, there’s what I read in Murray’s book. He reawakens the importance of the will in our prayer life, to a degree our detractors and I have never fully grasped:

“But the word of the Master teaches us more. He does not say, What dost thou wish? but, What does thou will? One often wishes for a thing without willing it. I wish to have a certain article, but I find the price too high; I resolve not to take it; I wish, but do not will to have it. The sluggard wishes to be rich, but does not will it. Many a one wishes to be saved, but perishes because he does not will it. The will rules the whole heart and life; if I really will to have anything that is within my reach, I do not rest till I have it. And so, when Jesus says to us, ‘What wilt thou?’ He asks whether it is indeed our purpose to have what we ask at any price, however great the sacrifice. Dost thou indeed so will to have it that, though He delay it long, thou dost not hold thy peace till He hear thee? Alas! how many prayers are wishes, sent up for a short time and then forgotten, or sent up year after year as matter of duty, while we rest content with the prayer without the answer.

“But, it may be asked, is it not best to make our wishes known to God, and then to leave it to Him to decide what is best, without seeking to assert our will? By no means. This is the very essence of the prayer of faith, to which Jesus sought to train His disciples, that it does not only make known its desire and then leave the decision to God. [emphasis mine.] That would be the prayer of submission, for cases in which we cannot know God’s will. But the prayer of faith, finding God’s will in some promise of the Word, pleads for that till it come. In Matthew (ix. 28) we read Jesus said to the blind man: ‘Believe ye that I can do this?’ Here, in Mark, He says: ‘What wilt thou that I should do?’ In both cases He said that faith had saved them. And so He said to the Syrophenician woman, too: ‘Great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt.’ Faith is nothing but the purpose of the will resting on God’s word, and saying: I must have it. To believe truly is to will firmly.

“But is not such a will at variance with our dependence on God and our submission to Him? By no means; it is much rather the true submission that honours God” (75-76).

Need I say more? All of you who denounce displace prayer with Will Power, this is my answer! You are not limited by the laws of nature but by the will of God! No amount of magic(k) or effort can overcome it! And to you Christians I say, stop praying ineffectively! You are limited by the Will of God only, and He is a kind and merciful God, Who is delighted to give us more than we need.

The second is about sin. I mean, I’m working on memorizing these verses, right? From the Vest Pocket Companion for Christian Workers, by R.A. Torrey. And one of the first verses in there is I John 1:8, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” Which is pretty bad news… since we are supposed to “be perfect, just as [our] Father in heaven is perfect;” and, “stand in awe, and sin not.” I was talking to one of my friends and he said, it seems like it’s just setting you up to fail. Clearly the Lord doesn’t want us to spend all of our time in the temple, beating ourselves up and crying, “have mercy on me, a sinner!” Besides, isn’t God “faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above what ye are able; but will with the temptation provide a way of escape, that ye may be able to bear it?” Then why are we condemned to perpetuate this “wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death?”

Well, the only plausible explanation that I can come up with is, this whole life is just one long, torturous purification ritual. We are doomed to be punished and to suffer and to repent, and repent again and, just when we feel that we’ve suffered enough to have ceased from sin (I Peter 4:1), we run up against I John 1:8. Where does it end? Don’t you know, it’s pretty stressful being stuck in this rut with pretty much a guarantee that the only escape is death. Any thoughts?? Because I’d just like to put my sin behind me, once and for all. lol

Heroes

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008
I’m standing on the sword of the Dragon
He can’t pull it from beneath my feet
Down in the darkened cavern
In the field of blood I’ll watch him bleed
Watching the smoke rise from the wounded hero
Standing dazed in the acid rain
A bitter taste in the air
I hear the danger of the tightening chains

Heroes, heroes, heroes are not here to stay
They will all fade away
Except the One who raised

I crawled through the ruins of old
Beneath its rubble lies a city of gold
His hands are chapped and bleeding cold
Returning all the riches that had been stolen
The people stand in the street and stare
The hangman releases his chilling cry
The heavens split to see the earth
The serpent is wrenching his silence sigh

– Bride

Incidentally, my new favorite band is Disciple.

Brazilian Christian Punk Rock!?

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

These guys are insanely good. Well, OK, it’s punk rock so don’t expect much but the sound is surprisingly raw and nice. Plus they have that, “yeah, we don’t speak English… SO WHAT?” attitude.

http://ctnow.com.com/incinnameofchrist/3600-8434_32-100948181.html?tag=MDL_listing_song_artist